Han you don't mention which version of SA you're running with your MailScanner implementation. Might be time to upgrade if you're running something that's reasonably old.
-- Martin Hepworth Oxford, UK On 24 January 2011 13:54, Han Boetes <hboe...@utelisys.com> wrote: > On 01/24/2011 02:22 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > The above is the *only* stock SA rule. The overall score of that ham > > should be 0.8, way below the default threshold. All remaining rules > > shown below are your local rules, responsible for the false positive. > > > > Hint: A rule that matches "mangled short English word" tends to be not > > suitable for any other language. > > I started looking and there are a lot of rules from > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/ > > Which is down. Also the date on those rules is 2004! That can't be > effective anymore. > > Thanks for your help. > > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > Han Boetes > -- > Utelisys > >
