On 02/17/2014 03:24 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/17/2014 9:13 AM, Axb wrote:
On 02/17/2014 03:09 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/17/2014 8:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
seems after last rule update we've got new rule BAYES_99 in
72_scores.cf but
without score (and thus default 1.0) in 50_scores.cf.
... a mistake happened apparently?
I'll look and see. I've never tried to promote a bayes rule so it might
need to bypass sandbox.
seems the scores are way to high as well
score BAYES_99 0 0 4.3 4.0
score BAYES_999 0 0 4.8 4.5
I'd test with no publish
Scores in the sandbox are ceilings.
could we agree to set the ceilings on lower safer scores?
If possible use different rulenames so as not to tamper with the
existing BAYES_99 stuff which could cause issues on production boxes.
and not force publish till we have performance data
