On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:09:33 -0500 Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 2/17/2014 8:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > seems after last rule update we've got new rule BAYES_99 in > > 72_scores.cf but > > without score (and thus default 1.0) in 50_scores.cf. > > > > ... a mistake happened apparently? > > > I'll look and see. I've never tried to promote a bayes rule so it > might need to bypass sandbox.
I have spam that's already hitting BAYES_999 with the default 1.0 score.
