On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 02:11:47 -0700 (PDT) zespri wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote > > djbdns? > > I really wonder, when more alternatives were advised to you, > > why did you choose the oldest, worst, most buggy and years > > unsupported alternative? >
> In short: when you get several options offered to you, and you have > no prior knowledge you've got to pick one randomly. That's what I did. If you've already installed djbdns I'd leave it. I'm still using it and a lot of people only migrated away because they needed dnssec. If you are just running a soho server or desktop you aren't going to come under the kind of concerted poisoning attack that ISP caches would attract. It might not be under active development, but it was programmed very conservatively, and has a security history that's as impressive as bind's is dismal. Most of the criticism against djbdns are either myths or don't apply to the dnscache component. I'd be very surprised if you have a problem with it.
