> On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:42:50 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I would not be surprised... I have already met people having
>> problem because of djbdns (and that's why I don't recommend using
>> it)
RW wrote:
> What problem did they have specifically with dnscache?
On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:35:52 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote:
Seconded; I'd be interested in this as well since I have not yet run
into operational issues with djbdns.
On 06.06.14 16:47, RW wrote:
He sent me an email in which he quoted the "dnscache doesn't fully
implement "forwardonly" mode" bug from
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/djbdns-problems.html
That's not relevant to the OP.
Sorry, seems I had to post it to the list (not sure why i didn't...)
Whether it's relevant (now) to the OP or not, I think this may change very
soon andf along with other djbdns issues mentioned there I still think
people should avoid it as much as possible.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.
