On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 02:11:47 -0700 (PDT) zespri wrote:
In short: when you get several options offered to you, and you have
no prior knowledge you've got to pick one randomly. That's what I did.
On 06.06.14 15:14, RW wrote:
If you've already installed djbdns I'd leave it. I'm still using it and
a lot of people only migrated away because they needed dnssec. If you
are just running a soho server or desktop you aren't going to come
under the kind of concerted poisoning attack that ISP caches would
attract.
It might not be under active development, but it was programmed
very conservatively, and has a security history that's as impressive as
bind's is dismal. Most of the criticism against djbdns are either
myths or don't apply to the dnscache component. I'd be very surprised
if you have a problem with it.
I would not be surprised... I have already met people having problem because
of djbdns (and that's why I don't recommend using it)
I still find having supported and recent version of DNS server better
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
