Am 31.10.2015 um 16:06 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com:
So after initial learning it looks better now. (BAYES_50)
BAYES_50 is not really good for clear spam
When sendmail sends email to procmail and procmail passes it to spam assassin, does spam assassin runs as root user or as the user the email is destined to?
depends on how SA is called in detail, normally it should switch to that unix-user and hence training as root makes no sense, *nothing* should proceed potentially dangerous input as root at all - inbound mailcontent is by definition that sort of "don#t do that" input
I run the sa-learn as root user
oh my god.......
and it seems like this is the data based that is being used so it would be global data base used for all mail users?
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FROM_12LTRDOM,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,
URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
well, the quota of your sa-headers was enough to reject my repsonse on the submission spamass-milter
result: Y 16 - URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
