> > > Am 31.10.2015 um 16:06 schrieb j...@lexoncom.com: >> So after initial learning it looks better now. (BAYES_50) > > BAYES_50 is not really good for clear spam > yep i though that bayes was used but it seems like it was all useless
>> When sendmail sends email to procmail and procmail passes it to spam >> assassin, does spam assassin runs as root user or as the user the email >> is destined to? > > depends on how SA is called in detail, normally it should switch to that > unix-user and hence training as root makes no sense, *nothing* should > proceed potentially dangerous input as root at all - inbound mailcontent > is by definition that sort of "don#t do that" input > >> I run the sa-learn as root user > > oh my god....... i run it through the crontab yes i can create new user and force sa-learn to use that user > >> and it seems like this is the data based >> that is being used so it would be global data base used for all mail >> users? > > https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup i switched to global setup now all users should use same db and i will use the manual learning process > >> X-Spam-Flag: YES >> X-Spam-Level: ************ >> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.9 required=5.0 >> tests=BAYES_50,FROM_12LTRDOM, >> >> HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL, >> >> RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM, >> URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 > > well, the quota of your sa-headers was enough to reject my repsonse on > the submission spamass-milter > > result: Y 16 - URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL > > no sure what this means?
