On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
On 8/18/2016 12:16 PM, John Hardin wrote:
There are also potential DNS issues that may contribute. In addition to
describing your environment, perhaps you could post the X-Spam-Status
header from a couple of the low-scoring spams.
John,
This is the X-Spam-Status header I got back on an uncaught spam. No, hits=0.3
required=5.0. The spam was selling an all-in-one charger.
D'oh. If it's not scored spammy the rule hits won't be there. Can you post
the X-Spam_Status header from a message that scored as spammy?
What kind of DNS issues? I lease a server from Peer1 and use their name
servers.
That's part of the problem. Your DNSBL and URIBL lookups are being
aggregated with others' and are probably exceeding the free query limits.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gun Control enables genocide while doing little to reduce crime.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until the 1937th anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii
