Hi, >>> The ENA_BAD_SPAM rule is a combination of 2 different types (reputation >>> and >>> content) rules with an AND between them. For example (this is is about >>> one-third of the rule): >> >> Is it usable like this? > > Try it out with a score of 0.001 and see what you think. It should have > been valid. Just drop it in and run: > > spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | /bin/grep -Ei '(failed|undefined > dependency|score set for non-existent rule)' | /bin/grep ENA_
By "usable" I meant have you included enough of the rule for it to really be effective? I let it run for the day, and it's just not anchored well enough to provide any meaningful benefit. It's hitting on jcpenny, vresp.com, constantcontact, sendgrid, facebook, etc.
