That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Someone who doesn't know any better about how to write a modern web application and insists that JSP code is "closer to the bare metal" and thus better.
Norman Franke Answering Service for Directors, Inc. www.myasd.com On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote: > Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil old > incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and feels bad > about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties). > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Lance Java > To: Tapestry users > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:38 PM > Subject: Re: Web frameworks > > > I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this > tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar to > this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this thread. > > > On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be found here: >> >> http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/ >> >> To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me very >> nervous to even consider Tapestry for our upcoming project. I'm scared >> Tapestry may be abandoned one day and leave us in the cold. It may be a >> nice framework, but Tapestry's popularity is extremely low within the >> developers' community. Why is that? Is it because of it's track record on >> releases and backward compatibility issues, which I read a lot about on >> google search? Or is it because it's a one man project? >> >> What do you think? >> >> Regards, >> Emmanuel >>
