Well, there are too few ( 20 or so?) Tapestry users to warrant a Facebook page. So I think this is the best place to enlighten people.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Jens Breitenstein <mailingl...@j-b-s.de>wrote: > Emmanuel, > > please stop your spam. This is a mailing list for developers even stupid > ones like us using tapestry. > Create your little Facebook page name it "Tapestry sucks" add a "I dislike > it too" button or something else and we all can continue with more serious > stuff. > > Jens > > > Am 20.11.13 22:12, schrieb Emmanuel Sowah: > > Alexander, >> >> I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Tapestry cannot be revived. Tapestry has >> been in coma for too long. As you may know, people who have been in coma >> for a very long time cannot be revived. They ultimately die, as Tapestry >> is >> slowly dying now. Check the article found at >> http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision- >> makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/. >> Choose one of those frameworks mentioned there and you'll be fine. >> >> Cheers >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Alexander Sommer < >> alexander.som...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> tapestry would and will easily revive if 5.4. would come out with full >>> jQuery (and jQuery mobile) support ;-) >>> >>> I am just waiting for 5.4 and think that others are doing the same. >>> >>> I also would love mobile web templates with 5.4 based on jQuery mobile. >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/20 Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> >>> >>> What a troll!! >>>> >>>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote: >>>> >>>> Guys, >>>>> >>>>> You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to see >>>>> >>>> the >>> >>>> reality. The fact of the matter is Tapestry is no more relevant in the >>>>> developers community. Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in his >>>>> projects. Stop being stupid and look around for a better alternative. >>>>> >>>> Your >>>> >>>>> knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job anywhere. >>>>> Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home. As we're speaking >>>>> >>>> now, >>>> >>>>> Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's project.Leave this cult >>>>> >>>> and >>> >>>> do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an >>>>> inevitable death. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Norman Franke <nor...@myasd.com> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Someone who doesn't know >>>>>> >>>>> any >>>> >>>>> better about how to write a modern web application and insists that >>>>>> >>>>> JSP >>> >>>> code is "closer to the bare metal" and thus better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Norman Franke >>>>>> Answering Service for Directors, Inc. >>>>>> www.myasd.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil >>>>>>> >>>>>> old incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and >>>>>> >>>>> feels >>>> >>>>> bad about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties). >>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> From: Lance Java >>>>>>> To: Tapestry users >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:38 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Web frameworks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this >>>>>>> tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar >>>>>>> >>>>>> to >>> >>>> this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this >>>>>>> >>>>>> thread. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> found >>> >>>> here: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision- >>> makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/ >>> >>>> To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> very >>>> >>>>> nervous to even consider Tapestry for our upcoming project. I'm >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> scared >>> >>>> Tapestry may be abandoned one day and leave us in the cold. It may >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> be >>> >>>> a >>>> >>>>> nice framework, but Tapestry's popularity is extremely low within >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>> >>>> developers' community. Why is that? Is it because of it's track >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> record >>> >>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>>> releases and backward compatibility issues, which I read a lot about >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> on >>>> >>>>> google search? Or is it because it's a one man project? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Emmanuel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
