tapestry would and will easily revive if 5.4. would come out with full jQuery (and jQuery mobile) support ;-)
I am just waiting for 5.4 and think that others are doing the same. I also would love mobile web templates with 5.4 based on jQuery mobile. 2013/11/20 Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> > What a troll!! > > On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to see the > > reality. The fact of the matter is Tapestry is no more relevant in the > > developers community. Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in his > > projects. Stop being stupid and look around for a better alternative. > Your > > knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job anywhere. > > Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home. As we're speaking > now, > > Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's project.Leave this cult and > > do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an > > inevitable death. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Norman Franke <nor...@myasd.com> > wrote: > > > >> That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Someone who doesn't know > any > >> better about how to write a modern web application and insists that JSP > >> code is "closer to the bare metal" and thus better. > >> > >> Norman Franke > >> Answering Service for Directors, Inc. > >> www.myasd.com > >> > >> > >> > >> On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil > >> old incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and > feels > >> bad about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties). > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: Lance Java > >>> To: Tapestry users > >>> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:38 PM > >>> Subject: Re: Web frameworks > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this > >>> tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar to > >>> this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this > thread. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be found > >> here: > >>>> > >>>> > >> > http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/ > >>>> > >>>> To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me > very > >>>> nervous to even consider Tapestry for our upcoming project. I'm scared > >>>> Tapestry may be abandoned one day and leave us in the cold. It may be > a > >>>> nice framework, but Tapestry's popularity is extremely low within the > >>>> developers' community. Why is that? Is it because of it's track record > >> on > >>>> releases and backward compatibility issues, which I read a lot about > on > >>>> google search? Or is it because it's a one man project? > >>>> > >>>> What do you think? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Emmanuel > >>>> > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
