Hi Martin, Sorry got busy with all the emails but I thank you for the time you took to do this and I will read it very closely and let you know the results if you are interested.
Thanks everyone for all the helpful comments! Regards, Tony Anecito, Founder, MyUniPortal --- Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tony- > > *If* you're comfortable with Tomcat serving all your > content then you > *could* assign Port 80 to non-SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector > > I found this quite helpful concerning tuning your > Apache Server > http://www.howtoforge.com/configuring_apache_for_maximum_performance > > If you're going to stay with Apache Tomcat > connectors I found this > Apache-Tomcat connector readme helpful > http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/connectors.html > > An article from craig on Apache and Tomcat > integration (albeit dated from > 03) > http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=104874913017036&w=2 > > Of course benchmarking which seems to be so > dependent on your environment > that nobody will publish results without YMMV as > seen here > http://www2.linuxjournal.com/article/4752 > > This is a TC 5.9 benchmark suggesting 7085 > requests/min on 1.4Ghz 2gb ram > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/200505.mbox/%3C200505251 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Then again running latest POSIX compliant kernels > make a BIG difference as > seen here in this benchmark of POSIX compliant 2.6 > kernel vs 2.4 > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-web26/ > > YMMV! > Martin-- > > > > > M-- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Anecito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:15 AM > Subject: RE: Tomcat performance measurments... > > > > I would but I have a web site off of the Apache > web > > server and I have the port 80 used by it. > > > > -Tony > > > > --- Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Tony Anecito > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Also, any hints on how to improve Tomcat > > > performance > > > > appreciated. > > > > > > Why not do the easy one - get rid of that extra > > > layer of > > > performance-sapping httpd and mod_jk in the > middle > > > instead? > > > > > > - Peter > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To start a new topic, e-mail: > > > users@tomcat.apache.org > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > ________ > > Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights > and hotels with Yahoo! > FareChase. > > http://farechase.yahoo.com/ > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To start a new topic, e-mail: > users@tomcat.apache.org > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: > users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
