Mark

6.0.18 **does** unpack a foo#bar.war to a foo#bar directory

as long as you have enough disk space ( woops ;)

interestingly no error message to tell you if the unpack failed tho'....

I'm havng a little bit of trouble picking up local resources in my app
deployed as foo#bar, using the ClassLoader, 
- but I'm sure I can fix this as the ClassLoader is picking up bundled
libraries OK

thanks again


Trevor Paterson PhD
new email [EMAIL PROTECTED]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 25 August 2008 17:37
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat6 relative contexts
> 
> trevor paterson (RI) wrote:
> > excellent thanks Mark - I changed to build 18 and 
> foo#bar.war deploys 
> > to context /foo/bar
> > 
> > it doesn't seem to unpack? there may be a good reason for this??
> 
> It should. There is some work on my todo list in that area. 
> I'll add checking this to that list.
> 
> Mark
> 
> > 
> > Trevor Paterson PhD
> > new email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Bioinformatics
> > The Roslin Institute
> > Edinburgh University
> > Scotland EH25 9PS
> > phone +44 (0)131 5274477
> > http://www.roslin.ed.ac.uk
> > http://www.comparagrid.org
> > http://www.thearkdb.org
> > 
> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> > 
> > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in 
> > Scotland with registration number SC005336 Disclaimer:This 
> e-mail and 
> > any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
> > the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed. If you have 
> received it 
> > in error, please destroy all copies and inform the sender.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: 25 August 2008 16:45
> >> To: Tomcat Users List
> >> Subject: Re: Tomcat6 relative contexts
> >>
> >> trevor paterson (RI) wrote:
> >>> Prior to tomcat6 you could happily deploy a 'bar.war' to 
> a context 
> >>> like '/foo/bar' simply by including a context.xml file in
> >> the META-INF
> >>> directory of the war
> >>>  
> >>> with content  <Context path='/foo/bar'/>.
> >> Actually, that won't quite have done what you think it did. 
> >> You normally would have ended up with double deployment.
> >>
> >>> we can no longer get this to work - the only way we can get a 
> >>> subcontext recognized is by  putting this Context element in the 
> >>> server.xml (which then causes autodeployment to both '/bar'
> >> and '/foo/bar').
> >>>  
> >>> We have tried using the TomcatClientDeployer aswell as 
> deploying on 
> >>> start up and through the web interface to manager to no avail
> >>>  
> >>> are we missing some subtle change from tomcat5 to 6 that 
> is causing 
> >>> this?
> >> As of 6.0.18, you have a couple of options:
> >> 1. Deploy the war outside the appBase and use a 
> foo#bar.xml context 
> >> file 2. Name your war foo#bar.war 3. Deploy using a 
> directory foo#bar
> >>
> >> 2 & 3 only work in 6.0.18 onwards
> >>
> >> See
> >> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/context.html
> >> for details
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To 
> unsubscribe, 
> >> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To 
> unsubscribe, 
> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To 
> unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to