-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel,
On 2/8/2011 4:56 PM, Daniel Savard wrote: > However, increasing this limit for all instances may lead to a > situation where enough instances are claiming more memory at the same > time and beyond the physical memory available. Exactly. With the low-memory limit on each JVM, you are basically limited to OOME on a single JVM, while a high-memory limit on each JVM means that they can more easily interfere with each other due to paging. Of course, low-memory limits can still have this effect but if you do your math right -- system_memory / ((64MiB + slop_factor) * JVM_count) then you should be just fine. Your vendor's demand that you increase the heap space ruins that calculation. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1Rxw0ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBubwCfaKKd1IvVoGgiFsilvq9VvEs1 MN4Anj+2AU/g4PKJRh1Ia1rJQDJ1lAgs =wqAJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
