did you see what classes were using the additional memory in 1.6.0 ?
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > reproduced it with an app which has no jsf stuff at all > > 1.5.1: 75M at startup, 130 at runtime (about), 33 after GC > 1.6.0: 100M at startup, 150 at runtime, 40 after GC > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/5/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > > Also, prior to using 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot, I would check > memory > > used by TomEE and would see nice level right between 200m and 400m...a > > lot...even while users are logged in, doing work. > > > > Again, prior to using 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot, I was using > > 2013-03-27 version for almost 1 month. I'm always quite satisfied with > > snapshot versions (very stable and reliable, IMO). > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Probably in TomEE we do not yet remove all our scanning results and > > >>> temporary boot stuff after booting up the container. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> I think I have recognized that whenever I do a heap dump and I search > > >> 'classes' for 'jsf.'. > > >> > > > > > > CLARIFICATION: i usually do heap dumps when TomEE is kinda/quite > inactive > > > (no users logged in)...just to monitor GC a bit. > > > > > > > > >> > > >> 'jsf.' is how i search for many of my beans, but 'myfaces' > > >> classes/instances are always at the top of the list (which means > myfaces > > >> are using more memory than my classes). > > >> > > >> i usually only see 1 instance of my (normal) 'scoped' beans and my > > >> largest bean is only using like 1,600(K) bytes, I think (that's a > rough > > >> estimate). > > >> > > >> > > > CLARIFICATION: my non-normal-scoped beans usually list as '0' (zero) > > > instances and I think 0 (zero) memory used... of course, they are at > the > > > bottom of the list. > > > > > > > > > > > >
