currently looking but here are the dumps: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d65b3f832c1a6958a6d8 (1.6.0) https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d5a1c50a9ef2050a5cde (1.5.1)
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/5/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > did you see what classes were using the additional memory in 1.6.0 ? > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > reproduced it with an app which has no jsf stuff at all > > > > 1.5.1: 75M at startup, 130 at runtime (about), 33 after GC > > 1.6.0: 100M at startup, 150 at runtime, 40 after GC > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/5/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > > > > Also, prior to using 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot, I would check > > memory > > > used by TomEE and would see nice level right between 200m and 400m...a > > > lot...even while users are logged in, doing work. > > > > > > Again, prior to using 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot, I was using > > > 2013-03-27 version for almost 1 month. I'm always quite satisfied with > > > snapshot versions (very stable and reliable, IMO). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Probably in TomEE we do not yet remove all our scanning results and > > > >>> temporary boot stuff after booting up the container. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> I think I have recognized that whenever I do a heap dump and I > search > > > >> 'classes' for 'jsf.'. > > > >> > > > > > > > > CLARIFICATION: i usually do heap dumps when TomEE is kinda/quite > > inactive > > > > (no users logged in)...just to monitor GC a bit. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> 'jsf.' is how i search for many of my beans, but 'myfaces' > > > >> classes/instances are always at the top of the list (which means > > myfaces > > > >> are using more memory than my classes). > > > >> > > > >> i usually only see 1 instance of my (normal) 'scoped' beans and my > > > >> largest bean is only using like 1,600(K) bytes, I think (that's a > > rough > > > >> estimate). > > > >> > > > >> > > > > CLARIFICATION: my non-normal-scoped beans usually list as '0' (zero) > > > > instances and I think 0 (zero) memory used... of course, they are at > > the > > > > bottom of the list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
