sounds good to me. :)
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > thinking to it, we had a bunch of enhancement regarding tld scanning > caching which could explain a part of it + a better scanning for rest part > (i was testing a rest app) > > that said 33M vs 40M after GC sounds not aweful for a faster startup and a > more consistent runtime > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/5/2 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > hmm, > > > > just did the same exercise using openejb (no tomee, no tomcat) and 1.6.0 > > uses about the same as the 1.5.1 so the issue is either in tomee > > integration or tomcat itself > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/5/2 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > >> currently looking but here are the dumps: > >> > >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d65b3f832c1a6958a6d8 (1.6.0) > >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d5a1c50a9ef2050a5cde (1.5.1) > >> > >> > >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >> > >> > >> > >> 2013/5/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > >> > >>> did you see what classes were using the additional memory in 1.6.0 ? > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>> [email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>> > reproduced it with an app which has no jsf stuff at all > >>> > > >>> > 1.5.1: 75M at startup, 130 at runtime (about), 33 after GC > >>> > 1.6.0: 100M at startup, 150 at runtime, 40 after GC > >>> > > >>> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >>> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >>> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >>> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > 2013/5/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > >>> > > >>> > > Also, prior to using 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot, I would check > >>> > memory > >>> > > used by TomEE and would see nice level right between 200m and > >>> 400m...a > >>> > > lot...even while users are logged in, doing work. > >>> > > > >>> > > Again, prior to using 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot, I was using > >>> > > 2013-03-27 version for almost 1 month. I'm always quite satisfied > >>> with > >>> > > snapshot versions (very stable and reliable, IMO). > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > >>> > > [email protected] > >>> > > > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > >>> > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mark Struberg < > [email protected]> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >>> Probably in TomEE we do not yet remove all our scanning results > >>> and > >>> > > >>> temporary boot stuff after booting up the container. > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >> I think I have recognized that whenever I do a heap dump and I > >>> search > >>> > > >> 'classes' for 'jsf.'. > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > CLARIFICATION: i usually do heap dumps when TomEE is kinda/quite > >>> > inactive > >>> > > > (no users logged in)...just to monitor GC a bit. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> 'jsf.' is how i search for many of my beans, but 'myfaces' > >>> > > >> classes/instances are always at the top of the list (which means > >>> > myfaces > >>> > > >> are using more memory than my classes). > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> i usually only see 1 instance of my (normal) 'scoped' beans and > my > >>> > > >> largest bean is only using like 1,600(K) bytes, I think (that's > a > >>> > rough > >>> > > >> estimate). > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > CLARIFICATION: my non-normal-scoped beans usually list as '0' > >>> (zero) > >>> > > > instances and I think 0 (zero) memory used... of course, they are > >>> at > >>> > the > >>> > > > bottom of the list. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
