Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: > > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html > > It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. > > I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee > zip). > This decision would speedup the release. > >
Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. > > -- > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
