Hello Roberto,

is it broken again? I get 404


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest 
> TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>
>
>
>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roberto
>
>       From: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>
>  To: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" 
> <users@tomee.apache.org>
>  Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi David,
> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the 
> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are 
> looking into it.
> Cheers,Roberto
>       From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>  To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>
>  Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> First -- welcome, Roberto!  Great to see you on the list :)
> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT.  Would be great to track 
> these.  What CI are you using?  We could set something up on the Apache side 
> if needed.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> 
> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: 
> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles 
> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests 
> we got the following results:
> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related 
> with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. 
> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI 
> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing 
> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No 
> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with 
> other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No 
> support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few 
> tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. 
> Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into 
> the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently 
> most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build 
> including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will 
> be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
>       From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>  To: users@tomee.apache.org
>  Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <tibo...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>
>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>
>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>
>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>
>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
>> zip).
>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>
>>
>
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to