travis I guess? https://travis-ci.org/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/jobs/39782388
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-03 9:24 GMT+01:00 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>: > First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) > > We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track > these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache > side if needed. > > > -David > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. >> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: >> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added >> profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the >> samples / tests we got the following results: >> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are >> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. >> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI >> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing >> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No >> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related >> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test >> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta >> - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing >> a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket >> - OK >> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail >> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. >> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also >> missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI >> environment, but it will be there. >> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) >> Cheers,Roberto >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> To: users@tomee.apache.org >> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <tibo...@lycos.com> a écrit : >> > >> > See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: >> > >> > >> >> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html >> > >> > It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. >> > >> > I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the >> tomee >> > zip). >> > This decision would speedup the release. >> > >> > >> >> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it >> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay >> apache. >> >> Well stay openjpa i think. >> >> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the >> same about bval...one week of work and we got it. >> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html >> > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >>
