TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <daniels...@gmail.com>: > Roberto, > > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid >> wrote: > >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) >> Building now... >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> To: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" < >> users@tomee.apache.org> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> should be ok now >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> > Hi Roberto. >> > >> > you are right, will fix it quickly >> > >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> a >> > écrit : >> > >> >> This one is fixed :) >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely: >> >> >> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink >> >> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 >> >> Is this correct? >> >> Cheers,Roberto >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :) >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> hehe love this error: >> >> >> >> >> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console >> >> >> >> >> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]> >> >> but >> >> >> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]> >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> @rmannibucau >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >> > It does yes >> >> > >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <tibo...@lycos.com> a écrit : >> >> > >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples. >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would >> work >> >> >> now >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
