if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>: > I try. But, it doesn't like me. :( > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;) >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>: >> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :) >> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> >> > To: [email protected] >> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM >> > Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> > >> > Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and >> > probably another one for source code. >> > >> > -- >> > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> @rmannibucau >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>: >> >> > Roberto, >> >> > >> >> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez >> >> <[email protected] >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) >> >> >> Building now... >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> >> >> To: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" >> < >> >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> should be ok now >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> >> @rmannibucau >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> >: >> >> >> > Hi Roberto. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" >> <[email protected]> >> >> a >> >> >> > écrit : >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> This one is fixed :) >> >> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. >> >> For >> >> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: >> >> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here >> >> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 >> >> >> >> Is this correct? >> >> >> >> Cheers,Roberto >> >> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :) >> >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hehe love this error: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]> >> >> >> >> but >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> >> >> @rmannibucau >> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected] >> >> >: >> >> >> >> > It does yes >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in >> >> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples. >> >> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional >> would >> >> >> work >> >> >> >> >> now >> >> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html >> >> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net> >> >> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br >> >> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >> >> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro >> >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha >> >> >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
