The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth. I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a while and they are awesome. However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config like crazy in an attempt to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of.
I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these wonderful people include 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me. Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a virtual machine and give it a shot. :-) On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]>wrote: > > Am 13.10.2013 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > > I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a > cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my > > parent web cache. :-) > > > > Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering > if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it. > > besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?! > current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it > is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which > you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6 > but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2 > Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800 > Von: Mohd Akhbar <[email protected]> > Antwort an: [email protected] > An: [email protected] > > Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1 > > -- ____________________________________________________________ Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> Phone: (815) 355-5848 Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451 Microsoft Messenger - [email protected] <[email protected]> Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
