i do *not* understand your argumentation * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade" * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job * why does security not bother somebody these days? * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates
that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine" no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9 Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth. > > I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a > while and they are awesome. > However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config like > crazy in an attempt > to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of. > > I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these > wonderful people include > 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their distro > is a little old honestly doesn't bother me. > > Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a virtual > machine and give it a shot. :-) > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > > I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a > cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my > > parent web cache. :-) > > > > Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering > if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it. > > besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?! > current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it > is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which > you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6 > but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2 > Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800 > Von: Mohd Akhbar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Antwort an: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
