On Oct 13, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote:
> i do *not* understand your argumentation > > * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade" > * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job > * why does security not bother somebody these days? > * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates > > that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine" > no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9 Let's not get off-topic here. Adam, we don't have a CentOS 6.2 build bot, but we support 5.x and 6.x. I think that you will be fine. J > > Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace: >> The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth. >> >> I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a >> while and they are awesome. >> However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config like >> crazy in an attempt >> to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of. >> >> I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these >> wonderful people include >> 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their distro >> is a little old honestly doesn't bother me. >> >> Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a >> virtual machine and give it a shot. :-) >> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace: >>> I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a >>> cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my >>> parent web cache. :-) >>> >>> Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering if >>> anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it. >> >> besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?! >> current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it >> is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which >> you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6 >> but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel >> >> >> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2 >> Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800 >> Von: Mohd Akhbar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Antwort an: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> An: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1 >
