On 8/25/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think that is a foolish argument as you are assuming property model should
> only work on _beans_
> it is perfectly normal to do something like this:
>
> class data { public String name; public int age; }Yes, I hope you didn't really think that I would be against using public fields directly were you?! > and wicket should work with this. if this data object is a private inner of > something and is only used there wth is the point of creating > getters/setters? Because that confirms to the bean spec and to what probably 90% of people would initially expect. > so our property model should work like this: > > always try setter/getter first, if not fallback onto the field. > > i dont really see a danger of propertymodel accessing private members > because you can do it yourself if you wanted - and in fact you ARE doing it > yourself by specifying that property path. That is a ridiculous statement. Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
