On 8/30/07, Kirk Israel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Igor, I'm sorry I've sounded unappreciative to the work the team is doing. > > Yes, I'm a dumb curmudgeon who is having a lot of problems adjusting > to a new approach to things, and who, despite an honest effort to > embrace the wicket outlook, may have stumbled, and also dove right in > to the code base we started here with not enough in-depth reading of > "Pro Wicket" and fiddling around with more toy examples.... and then > after that, started to get childishly frustrated when things didn't go > the way I expected. On slashdot I'm more inclined to state my biases > in an extreme way, in part to get some counterargument -- and there > actually ended up being some good counterargument there, some wicket > fans who expressed how much they dig the approach. My team has decided > on wicket as the extensible, page centric approach to the fairly > complex app we have to write, and so far I've done a poor job of > thinking about Wicket deeply enough to know the best approaches to > things. > > It's why I came here with a question like what would be the better way > of doing this. Having had fragments pointed out to me (I knew more > about panels, I think... at least to the extent of using them to wrap > other components), and possibly thinking in terms of repeaters even > though it's only going to be 2 or 3 things, I'll try to find some time > and go back over some tutorials.
Thanks Kirk. I think we've all had occasions where we put biased opinions in public where we maybe regretted it later. I know I've been there. To the upside: there's never a dull moment on this list. More drama than an average soap opera :) Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
