I don't see reason why not, you can create a RFE in jira.

-Matej

On 9/2/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Creating a pluggable interface for this would allow for non-ASL solutions
> to
> be hosted through wicket-stuff projects.  The default implementation could
> stay as it is today.
>
>
> On 9/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, I certainly didn't want to reinvent the wheel. But all existing
> > solutions I was able to find either relied on a third part library
> > (shrinksafe) or had license not compatible with ASL. So I just wrote a
> > simple stripper. I think it still helps a lot, I didn't want to build a
> > perfect stripper.
> >
> > If you know of a solution that doesn't mean another dependency and is
> > compatible with ASL, I have no objections.
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 9/1/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been running my app through the YSlow firefox plugin, and have
> been
> > > *very* impressed on how wicket does the "right thing" most of the time
> > > (ex:
> > > gzip css and javascript).  nice work guys!
> > >
> > > While digging through the YSlow feedback, it suggested that the
> > javascript
> > > should be "minified".  This led me to the wicket JavascriptStripper,
> and
> > > after enabling it for my application, YSlow still reports that some
> > > scripts
> > > are not minified.
> > >
> > > There seem to be a number of javascript compression tools out there,
> and
> > > I'm
> > > wondering if this functionality could be "pluggable" in wicket.  I'm
> > > interested in trying out a few different options to see their results:
> > > * JSMin - http://inconspicuous.org/projects/jsmin/jsmin.java
> > > * Dojo Shrink Safe - http://dojotoolkit.org/docs/shrinksafe
> > >
> > > My impression is that the Wicket JavascriptStripper is a great
> starting
> > > solution, but there are quite a few very advanced solutions out there,
> > and
> > > it would be great if wicket could leverage them instead of
> "re-inventing
> > > the
> > > wheel".  Has anyone looked into this in the past?
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to