On 9/5/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, maybe we should provide a separate ZIP with the dependencies. > I guess if you're using Ivy or Maven 2, you're not going to be > downloading the ZIP at all. There may be licensing issues with this, > though. What do people think? Martijn?
Including the deps just doesn't increase the size to a double, but a 5 or 6 fold (iirc 65MB). The problem is with transitive deps that are test/compile/provided scope (for instance Spring includes just about the world). The best way currently is to do it as we do now IMO. The current direct deps are license compatible, but I really don't want to check all transitive deps for license compatibility. The current examples is already quite humongous in the dependency department. I have proposed a couple of weeks ago to move examples out of the main distribution, and make it a separate download, and do the same with the quickstart. The benefit would be that the license requirements for the main distribution download becomes smaller, only the stuff we include in the sources ourselves. Both the examples and quickstart would then include all necessary runtime deps for building a wicket application (as described in chapter 3 of wicket in action, and provided with wicket 1.2 until now). This makes them easier to provide a license file for. I just lack the time to make it so. In short: I don't like the idea of adding an all libs project and make it downloadable from Apache. We could make that a wicket stuff project though but the size would resemble downloading a whole maven repository. Martijn -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
