we dont need links, just a list. and i thought the trouble was related to skinning? if thats still the case can we just put a vanilla maven site on wicket-stuff or somewhere?
-igor On 9/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Remember the troubles I had with generating the site? Tim was working > on it, but it still is a long shot from being workable. > > And yes, it has a list of dependencies, but I don't think they > generate a link to download each and every one of them :| > > Martijn > > On 9/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > why dont we generate the maven stie somewhere? doesnt that have a list > of > > dependencies for each module? > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 9/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 9/5/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That said, maybe we should provide a separate ZIP with the > dependencies. > > > > I guess if you're using Ivy or Maven 2, you're not going to be > > > > downloading the ZIP at all. There may be licensing issues with this, > > > > though. What do people think? Martijn? > > > > > > Including the deps just doesn't increase the size to a double, but a 5 > > > or 6 fold (iirc 65MB). The problem is with transitive deps that are > > > test/compile/provided scope (for instance Spring includes just about > > > the world). > > > > > > The best way currently is to do it as we do now IMO. The current > > > direct deps are license compatible, but I really don't want to check > > > all transitive deps for license compatibility. The current examples is > > > already quite humongous in the dependency department. > > > > > > I have proposed a couple of weeks ago to move examples out of the main > > > distribution, and make it a separate download, and do the same with > > > the quickstart. The benefit would be that the license requirements for > > > the main distribution download becomes smaller, only the stuff we > > > include in the sources ourselves. > > > > > > Both the examples and quickstart would then include all necessary > > > runtime deps for building a wicket application (as described in > > > chapter 3 of wicket in action, and provided with wicket 1.2 until > > > now). This makes them easier to provide a license file for. I just > > > lack the time to make it so. > > > > > > In short: I don't like the idea of adding an all libs project and make > > > it downloadable from Apache. We could make that a wicket stuff project > > > though but the size would resemble downloading a whole maven > > > repository. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
