Remember the troubles I had with generating the site? Tim was working
on it, but it still is a long shot from being workable.

And yes, it has a list of dependencies, but I don't think they
generate a link to download each and every one of them :|

Martijn

On 9/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why dont we generate the maven stie somewhere? doesnt that have a list of
> dependencies for each module?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/5/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That said, maybe we should provide a separate ZIP with the dependencies.
> > > I guess if you're using Ivy or Maven 2, you're not going to be
> > > downloading the ZIP at all. There may be licensing issues with this,
> > > though. What do people think? Martijn?
> >
> > Including the deps just doesn't increase the size to a double, but a 5
> > or 6 fold (iirc 65MB). The problem is with transitive deps that are
> > test/compile/provided scope (for instance Spring includes just about
> > the world).
> >
> > The best way currently is to do it as we do now IMO. The current
> > direct deps are license compatible, but I really don't want to check
> > all transitive deps for license compatibility. The current examples is
> > already quite humongous in the dependency department.
> >
> > I have proposed a couple of weeks ago to move examples out of the main
> > distribution, and make it a separate download, and do the same with
> > the quickstart. The benefit would be that the license requirements for
> > the main distribution download becomes smaller, only the stuff we
> > include in the sources ourselves.
> >
> > Both the examples and quickstart would then include all necessary
> > runtime deps for building a wicket application (as described in
> > chapter 3 of wicket in action, and provided with wicket 1.2 until
> > now). This makes them easier to provide a license file for. I just
> > lack the time to make it so.
> >
> > In short: I don't like the idea of adding an all libs project and make
> > it downloadable from Apache. We could make that a wicket stuff project
> > though but the size would resemble downloading a whole maven
> > repository.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>


-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to