as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
is not cached use NonCachingImage.
-igor
On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
>
> regards Nino
>
> Matej Knopp wrote:
> > Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could
> do ;)
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
> >> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
> >> requests, not within one.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
> >>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
> >>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >>>
> >>> -Matej
> >>>
> >>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> >>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> johan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Actually we discussed that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> >>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
> millisecond.. As
> >>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
> the
> >>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
> concerned
> >>>>>> use nanotime.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
> >>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >>>>>>> Math.random());
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a
> feature
> >>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Nino
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> >>>>> ::
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
> request to
> >>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I
> thought
> >>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are
> that
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> >>>>>>>>>> comes in
> >>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> >> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
