I dont' understand. You rely on the way how wicket generates IDs? Then
your code is bound to break. If you really need a wicket component's
id in javascript, you either override getMarkupId(), or pass the Id
using javascript (e.g. label component assigning another component's
id into javascript variable).

-Matej

On 9/21/07, Sam Hough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you use it just because of the performance of the browser DOM? Not because
> it has to be unique?
>
> Are you using Ajax? ie forced to do setOutputMarkupId? We are and that is
> probably the biggest reason we are trying to avoid them.
>
>
>
>
>
> Alex Objelean wrote:
> >
> >
> > In my application I extensively use the component generated id to perform
> > some DOM updates on the client side, also for client-side validation.
> >
> > Also getting a DOM element by its ID is the fastest method comparing with
> > finding it using it's css class.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sam Hough wrote:
> >>
> >> When is the killer case for using id?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Objelean wrote:
> >>>
> >>> My personal opinion is that switching from id to class is not such a
> >>> good idea, simply because the ID attributes guaranties (of course you
> >>> can create two elements with same ID, but it is not the same as with
> >>> class attribute) the unicity of the element, also you can find the
> >>> element from js using document.getElementById...
> >>>
> >>> I hope that this radical change will not be made in the 1.3 release as
> >>> it has a great impact on any application developed using the latest
> >>> beta3 release. Also I think this issue should be discussed more between
> >>> the core developers.
> >>>
> >>> Alex.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sam Hough wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> We are going to stop using ids and move over to class as it make re-use
> >>>> easier and avoids a number of wicket problems with ids... The HTML
> >>>> monkey is not happy though. He reminds me of the Family Guy screaming
> >>>> monkey today.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex Objelean wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is about how wicket generates dynamically markupID.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have, for instance, the following markup component:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <input wicket:id="quantity.noOfUnits" />
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The generated markupId for this component looks like the following:
> >>>>> quantity.noOfUnits1232 .
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I suggest to escape any css valid specifiers from the generated
> >>>>> markupId, by replacing them with something else (for instance '_'
> >>>>> character).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The problem appear when I am trying to identify the component by it's
> >>>>> id using some js library (like jQuery) and as a consequence the result
> >>>>> of this query: $("#quantity.noOfUnits1232") is invalid.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alex.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--getMarkupId%28%29-tf4493344.html#a12821835
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to