If it helps: about half a year ago, we started to port a Swing
application to the web. We started with JSF, but after three months we
pulled the plug and switched to Wicket. We had converted everything to
Wicket in two months and about two thirds the code. Oh... and with two
instead of three developers. And did I mention that we added quite a bit
of AJAX bling in the process and EVERYTHING still works when you turn of
Javascript? And that there is none of the POST-only madness? 
I know JSF is supposedly the standard, but so is CORBA, and look where
that went;-)

Thomas

PS: a funny thing happend about 3 weeks into the Wicket port: one
Thursday I noticed that I had not been completely disgusted and ready to
quit (and become a goat farmer) a single time that week. Wicket does not
suck and sometimes it's downright cool.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert.mcguinness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Freitag, 28. September 2007 04:18
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Presented Wicket to my Company...
> 
> 
> ...to tell you the truth, it impressed the developers but I 
> didn't get that feeling from the top brass.  I am pretty sure 
> we will move towards Seam/JSF/Facelets (we have a 
> presentation on that tech next week given by another 
> developer) since it is "standard".
> 
> Has anyone here worked with the Seam tech?  All the examples 
> I have seen (including Facelets) is nothing but tag soup with 
> scriptlets in the page (albeit small).  The configuration for 
> a Seam project seems like a pain and was also told that the 
> JSF/Seam/Faclets jsp pages can be previewed in a browser 
> (something I thought was so clever about Wicket html 
> pages...and I was under the impression that Wicket was the 
> only tech that allowed true separation of concerns; allowing 
> the web designer to work independenly of the programmer with 
> no duplication of work between the two).  Maybe I'm blind to 
> Wicket and I'm overlooking Seam and the techs related to it?  
> 
> I've worked with Freemarker and Struts before and Wicket 
> feels like "natural" web development.  I thought I covered 
> all the great concepts about
> Wicket: Ajax, Templating, Inheritance, Reusable Components, 
> OO Concepts...etc...
> 
> Bah...just venting.  I'm going to have to win the votes of the 
> developers. 
> I'll keep everyone posted.  Thanks amigos!
> 
> - rm3
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Presented-Wicket-to-my-Company...-tf4532
> 130.html#a12933638
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to