i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they shouldnt
be invoked if you are doing string->string :|
-igor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
> or use that constructor with the type param
>
> does that help?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
> > for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
> > with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
> > the getConverter is called (output "here")
> > but the convertToObject never called (no "there")
> > I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
> > What I am doing wrong here?
> >
> >
> > public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
> >
> > public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
> > super(id);
> > setRequired(true);
> >
> > }
> > @Override
> > public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
> > System.out.println("here"+ arg0);
> > IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
> >
> > public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale arg1) {
> > System.out.println("there"+ arg0);
> > String s = "sss";
> > return s;
> > }
> >
> > public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale arg1) {
> > return (String)arg0;
> > }
> >
> > };
> > return icAppend;
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> > >Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with that
> > >result call the special one (camel casing?)
> > >
> > >On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Hello:
> > >> I wonder how to "append" a converter or java method to a component so
> > that
> > >I
> > >> would affect what is already defined. For example, I want "camelize" a
> > >> TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the converter
> > already
> > >> defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done in the
> > >> chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the final
> > >conversion
> > >> to my need. The example I am seeing appears to "overide" and only one
> > can
> > >be
> > >> defined for a component, unlike validators, that I could add a chain of
> > >> them. Let me know if I am wrong about this.
> > >> Thanks
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
