if you set the type yourself by hand then getConverter() will be called and
you can do what ever you want
We dont do that automatic yes (resolveType doesn't set it to the
String.class)
johan
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> i thought we agreed converters were type converters...so they shouldnt
> be invoked if you are doing string->string :|
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > call setTYpe(String.class) on the textfield
> > or use that constructor with the type param
> >
> > does that help?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:35 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Below is a custom component with overrding the getConverter
> > > for testing purpose. As you could see, it is plain simple one
> > > with simple output debugging. But it is not working.
> > > the getConverter is called (output "here")
> > > but the convertToObject never called (no "there")
> > > I basically cut and paste the WicketinAction example.
> > > What I am doing wrong here?
> > >
> > >
> > > public class RequiredUppperCaseTextField extends TextField {
> > >
> > > public RequiredUppperCaseTextField(String id) {
> > > super(id);
> > > setRequired(true);
> > >
> > > }
> > > @Override
> > > public final IConverter getConverter(Class arg000){
> > > System.out.println("here"+ arg0);
> > > IConverter icAppend = new IConverter(){
> > >
> > > public Object convertToObject(String arg0, Locale arg1) {
> > > System.out.println("there"+ arg0);
> > > String s = "sss";
> > > return s;
> > > }
> > >
> > > public String convertToString(Object arg0, Locale arg1) {
> > > return (String)arg0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > };
> > > return icAppend;
> > > }
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > >Override the getConverter() method. First call super and with that
> > > >result call the special one (camel casing?)
> > > >
> > > >On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> Hello:
> > > >> I wonder how to "append" a converter or java method to a component
> so
> > > that
> > > >I
> > > >> would affect what is already defined. For example, I want
> "camelize" a
> > > >> TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the converter
> > > already
> > > >> defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done in
> the
> > > >> chain) , I could use the added converted/method to make the final
> > > >conversion
> > > >> to my need. The example I am seeing appears to "overide" and only
> one
> > > can
> > > >be
> > > >> defined for a component, unlike validators, that I could add a
> chain of
> > > >> them. Let me know if I am wrong about this.
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >
> > >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
