On 3/16/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you guys do both realize that wicket:link is nothing more then > convinience. it isnt really meant to support all these complex > usecases. it is nice when you need to quickly include an image or link > to a near by page, but nothing more then that.
The usecase we're talking about is hardly complex. Nor is it unreasonable to think that <wicket:link> should be able to handle it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
