On 3/16/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/16/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you guys do both realize that wicket:link is nothing more then > > convinience. it isnt really meant to support all these complex > > usecases. it is nice when you need to quickly include an image or link > > to a near by page, but nothing more then that. > > > The usecase we're talking about is hardly complex. Nor is it > unreasonable to think that <wicket:link> should be able to handle it. > In fact, I believe I already have a patch that fixes it. I'll create a JIRA and attach the patch. You folks can discuss whether it is worthy or not to make it into core.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
