Well, "../" path it's slightly more tolerant to refactoring.
You can change anything that comes before the "../" without needing to touch
HTML files.

So Igor, do you always use absolute paths?

I'm thinking that's what I'll use, since the limited relative path support
only works when the current page is above the destination (in the path),
which for my package scheme is never.

-Phil

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> ../ syntax is just as prone to refactoring errors as the absolute
> path, so i dont buy that argument
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Phil Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, as a new user to Wicket, I just see it as another feature of
> Wicket.
> >
> >  There's no issues with it, if all your pages are in the same package.
> >  Is that what most Wicket developers do?
> >
> >  I agree that searching the classpath could be problematic and more
> involved
> >  to implement. But, the "../" support seems reasonable and would really
> help
> >  when you'd otherwise have to resort to full absolute paths (which it
> seems
> >  to me is most the time).
> >
> >  In general, if a framework allows things to break easily when
> refactoring
> >  occurs, this is not good.
> >
> >  BTW, NetBeans (even with the Wicket plugin) does not fix the paths when
> I
> >  refactor the package name. It's nice that IDEA does. NetBeans kinda
> blows
> >  (buggy as hell), but I'm stuck with it for now :(
> >
> >  Phil
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, James Carman <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >  > On 3/16/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > > you guys do both realize that wicket:link is nothing more then
> >  > >  convinience. it isnt really meant to support all these complex
> >  > >  usecases. it is nice when you need to quickly include an image or
> link
> >  > >  to a near by page, but nothing more then that.
> >  >
> >  > The usecase we're talking about is hardly complex.  Nor is it
> >  > unreasonable to think that <wicket:link> should be able to handle it.
> >  >
> >  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >  Phil Grimm
> >  Mobile: (858) 335-3426
> >  Skype: philgrimm336
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Phil Grimm
Mobile: (858) 335-3426
Skype: philgrimm336

Reply via email to