You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address JSR-268 compliance?
Many thanks Thijs wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using > com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of > javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without > losing most of wickets functionality. > I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket > working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code > to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything. > > Thijs > > Bobby Quninne wrote: >> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with >> liferay 5. >> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD >> stuff. >> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Thijs wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while >>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues >>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the >>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is >>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the >>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice >>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages. >>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and >>> track it to follow the property changes >>> >>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can track >>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at >>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a >>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. >>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so >>> don't get over excited just jet :). >>> >>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll >>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work >>> I've been doing. >>> >>> I hope that answers your questions a bit. >>> Thijs >>> >>> >>> >>> gaugat wrote: >>> >>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR >>>> 286) to >>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets >>>> using >>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample >>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still >>>> issues >>>> with Wicket and Liferay? >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17077583.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
