Thank you very much for the prompt responses Thijs. Will have to consider another framework for portlet development, at least until wicket-crew wrap up integration.
Keep up the brilliant work! Thijs wrote: > > Bobby Quninne schreef: >> Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this? >> > Not sure what you are asking. The current JSR-168 implementation in > wicket is pretty much final, and for wicket 1.3.x will probably not > change. However newer versions of wicket probably will not be backwards > compatible, with JSR 168, but I don't know for sure... >> If so, is there a version of wicket and liferay that are compatible? >> > As described below. An out of the box wicket version will NOT work on > any version of Liferay. So there is no Wicket version that is compatible. > If you are willing to work with a patched version of wicket, then you > can work with wicket 1.3.3 and LF5(as we are) > > > Thijs >> Many thanks Thijs :-) >> >> >> Thijs wrote: >> >>> No, as described it depends on several factors >>> 1. my/other people's time to commit to this >>> 2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications >>> >>> Thijs >>> >>> Bobby Quninne schreef: >>> >>>> You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will >>>> address >>>> JSR-268 compliance? >>>> >>>> Many thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> Thijs wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using >>>>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of >>>>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without >>>>> losing most of wickets functionality. >>>>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get >>>>> wicket >>>>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay >>>>> code >>>>> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything. >>>>> >>>>> Thijs >>>>> >>>>> Bobby Quninne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) >>>>>> with >>>>>> liferay 5. >>>>>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard >>>>>> CRUD >>>>>> stuff. >>>>>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thijs wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However >>>>>>> while >>>>>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues >>>>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the >>>>>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the >>>>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice >>>>>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages. >>>>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and >>>>>>> track it to follow the property changes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can >>>>>>> track >>>>>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. >>>>>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> don't get over excited just jet :). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll >>>>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the >>>>>>> work >>>>>>> I've been doing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit. >>>>>>> Thijs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> gaugat wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 >>>>>>>> (JSR >>>>>>>> 286) to >>>>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets >>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a >>>>>>>> sample >>>>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078837.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
