The name wicket-annotations doesn't really tell you anything about what features it provides (as was pointed out earlier). If I were a person wanting to find an easier way to mount pages, it wouldn't necessarily be obvious to check wicket-annotations. However, it would be more obvious if I saw something called wicket-automount.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the only reason to break annotations out into separate distributions is if > new dependencies are introduced with a subset of annotations. > > if a new annotation comes along that requires hibernate jars to be on the > classpath, that definitely should be it's own project. otherwise, it makes > sense to lump all annotations together. > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Yes, but should we globalize the "annotations" namespace to mean that > > anyone who wants to do anything with annotations should put it inside > > this project? Perhaps keeping things smaller is a better idea. That > > way, if I want to use automount, but I don't want all of the other > > annotation-based goodies, I can just download this little nugget and > > use it. > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Matthijs, > > > > > > That is a good point and I did consider that, but I thought if anyone > > else > > > wants to do things with annotations and wicket in the future, this > > would be > > > a perfect place to put that code (especially given the underlying > > scanning > > > support). Thus, I was being optimistic about the future. Believe me, > > I > > > spent an hour staring out the window trying to decide on the right > > name. > > > > > > Hopefully the documentation explains clearly what it does. > > > > > > -Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote: > > > > > > > > Doug Donohoe wrote: > > > >> I am pleased to announce the 1.0 release of wicketstuff-annotation. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Nice. But the name 'wicketstuff-annotation' does not say anything > > about > > > > what it does, just 'something with annotations'. IMO > > > > 'wicketstuff-mount-annotations' or somesuch would be better. > > > > > > > > Just my 2c. > > > > Matthijs > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/-announce--wicketstuff-annotation-1.0-released-tp17090601p17091003.html > > > > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
