On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would it be better if there were a core wicket-annotation project that > > provides the basics (such as the scanner) and another project called > > wicket-automount (with wicket-annotation dependency)? That way other > > "future" projects can utilize the core capabilities without reinventing > > the wheel. This would also accommodate those who want a specific > > dependency for wicket-automount. > > The project can be split without needing to make one a core project > though. On the long term we could consider making something like that > a core project, but for now that simply wouldn't be practical. The > great thing about wicket-stuff projects is that it is easy for people > to join the effort.
I don't think they meant core project as in a subproject of Wicket, hosted at the ASF. I think they meant a core wicket-annotations project at wicketstuff that others could "lean on" > > Eelco > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
