On Saturday 07 June 2008 22:09:02 Ashley Aitken wrote: > So my question is: what is the status (now and going forward) with > regards to using Groovy to develop with Wicket? I know there has been > much discussion of generifying Wicket but perhaps moving to a dynamic > language could be an alternative future. > > Of course, using Groovy with Wicket wouldn't require the framework > itself to be implemented in Groovy or even that everyone uses Groovy. > And, as you all probably know Groovy can easily call an Java class > library.
I like the idea of using groovy and in general using dynamic language would be interesting indeed. But I think you might be not 100% correct about using groovy as it is. The main problem in my view is the lack of anonymous classes in groovy which are widely used by wicket. I wrote a little bit more about it a while ago here http://www.nabble.com/Feedback-on-proposed-Groovy-DSL-syntax-for-Wicket-tt15873183.html > So what do people think about Groovy and Wicket? IMHO they cannot be easily used together at the moment. Dima --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
