On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Dmitry Kandalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the idea of using groovy and in general using dynamic language would be > interesting indeed. But I think you might be not 100% correct about using > groovy as it is. The main problem in my view is the lack of anonymous classes > in groovy which are widely used by wicket. > Anonymous classes aren't needed in Groovy. In Groovy, you have closures. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
