Why are only digits allowed?  This stops me using a CompoundPropertyModel. 
It seems to work fine apart from the warning.


igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> On Nov 16, 2007 2:55 PM, Edvin Syse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why is container0 a non-safe id,
> 
> because it contains nondigits like the message said?
> 
>> and isn't it wrong to use only digits
>> for id's in css?
> 
> this is component id, not css id...
> 
> -igor
> 
> 
>>
>> SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN is defined as "^\\d+$".
>>
>> I currently use 1.3-rc1.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Edvin Syse
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Is-SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN-in-AbstractRepeater-correct%2C-or-does-it-break-CSS-spec--tp13803342p18901599.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to