there are a couple of historical reasons that are hard for us to remove due to api compatibility requirements in 1.3 and 1.4.
this is something we can address once work starts on 1.5 -igor On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:20 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why are only digits allowed? This stops me using a CompoundPropertyModel. > It seems to work fine apart from the warning. > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >> >> On Nov 16, 2007 2:55 PM, Edvin Syse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Why is container0 a non-safe id, >> >> because it contains nondigits like the message said? >> >>> and isn't it wrong to use only digits >>> for id's in css? >> >> this is component id, not css id... >> >> -igor >> >> >>> >>> SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN is defined as "^\\d+$". >>> >>> I currently use 1.3-rc1. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Edvin Syse >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Is-SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN-in-AbstractRepeater-correct%2C-or-does-it-break-CSS-spec--tp13803342p18901599.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
