Yeah I will do that... but it seems to work OK anyway. So I am curious why the id must be numeric?
igor.vaynberg wrote: > > why are you even getting the warning? add an intermediate item if you > want to use the CPM > > repeatingview rv=new repeatingview(); > webmarkupcontainer item=new webmarkupcontainer(rv.newchildid()); > rv.add(item); > > item.add(componentwithwhateveridyouwant) > > -igor > > On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Am I OK to continue ignoring the warning? Or will this bite me somewhere >> else? >> >> >> igor.vaynberg wrote: >>> >>> there are a couple of historical reasons that are hard for us to >>> remove due to api compatibility requirements in 1.3 and 1.4. >>> >>> this is something we can address once work starts on 1.5 >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:20 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why are only digits allowed? This stops me using a >>>> CompoundPropertyModel. >>>> It seems to work fine apart from the warning. >>>> >>>> >>>> igor.vaynberg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 16, 2007 2:55 PM, Edvin Syse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> Why is container0 a non-safe id, >>>>> >>>>> because it contains nondigits like the message said? >>>>> >>>>>> and isn't it wrong to use only digits >>>>>> for id's in css? >>>>> >>>>> this is component id, not css id... >>>>> >>>>> -igor >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN is defined as "^\\d+$". >>>>>> >>>>>> I currently use 1.3-rc1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>> Edvin Syse >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Is-SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN-in-AbstractRepeater-correct%2C-or-does-it-break-CSS-spec--tp13803342p18901599.html >>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Is-SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN-in-AbstractRepeater-correct%2C-or-does-it-break-CSS-spec--tp13803342p18907077.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-SAFE_CHILD_ID_PATTERN-in-AbstractRepeater-correct%2C-or-does-it-break-CSS-spec--tp13803342p18907674.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
